English

Civil Code Lease: contractual freedom, real risks, and the right profiles

7 minutes

The Civil Code lease is attracting more and more Parisian landlords. Free rent, flexible duration, no rent control, no 1989 law — on paper, it is the ideal regime. And in the right cases, it truly is. But used outside its legal framework, this contract can turn against you in a brutal and costly way.

This guide explains what the Civil Code lease really is, in which situations it is relevant, what risks it involves — and why the tenant's profile is the key to everything.

Civil Code lease: what are we talking about?

The Civil Code lease is based on articles 1709 et seq. of the Civil Code. It is the classic letting contract, based on contractual freedom. It applies when the law of July 6, 1989 does not apply — meaning when the accommodation is not the tenant's primary residence.

In practice, it is suitable for three well-defined situations:


Situation

Suitable Civil Code lease?

Secondary residence (occupied less than 8 months/year)

Yes

Rental to a legal entity (company, embassy)

Yes

Pied-à-terre, occasional occupation or mobility

Yes

Accommodation constituting the tenant's primary residence

No — 1989 law mandatory

💡 Legal reminder: Article 2 of the law of July 6, 1989 defines the primary residence as the accommodation occupied at least 8 months per year. Below this threshold, the 1989 law does not apply and the Civil Code lease is fully valid.

The freedom this lease truly offers

When used within its legal framework, the Civil Code lease is one of the most flexible regimes on the French rental market. Here is what the landlord can freely set:

Parameter

What the Civil Code lease allows

Rent

Freely set — no rent control applicable

Duration

Free — a few months to several years

Security deposit

Free in amount

Contractual clauses

Tailor-made according to the parties

Termination

3 months' notice before the end of the term, without having to justify a reason

For a well-located Parisian apartment intended for corporate or diplomatic clientele, this pricing freedom can represent a difference of 30 to 50% compared to rent control caps — without any regulatory violation.

The central risk: reclassification

This is where many landlords get burned. The Civil Code lease is not a lawless zone — it is a precise legal framework, which ceases to apply as soon as the reality of occupation no longer corresponds to its conditions.

If the accommodation in reality becomes the tenant's primary residence, the 1989 law applies automatically and retroactively — regardless of the clauses written into your contract. The judge does not look at what is written. He looks at what actually happens.

⚠️ The Court of Cassation is consistent on this point (Cass. 3e civ., April 29, 2009): a contractual regime cannot be invoked to bypass the protective law if the conditions for applying that law are met in practice.

The signals that trigger reclassification

Warning sign

Associated risk

Tenant without other stable housing

High

Continuous occupation throughout the year

High

Tax and postal address in the property

High

Children attending school in the neighborhood

High

Energy consumption corresponding to permanent occupation

Medium to high

What you concretely risk

If the reclassification is ordered by a court:

All your clauses contrary to the 1989 law become unenforceable. Your notice to vacate can be cancelled if it does not respect strict rules (legal reason, six-month notice period, required form). The freely set duration is replaced by the legal duration (3 years for unfurnished rentals, 1 year for furnished). Certain amounts provided for in the contract can be disputed and refunded. You enter into long, uncertain, and costly litigation — often much more expensive than the constraints of the 1989 law you were trying to avoid.

Two concrete cases to understand the limit

Case 1 — The employee "on assignment" who moves in

You sign a 12-month Civil Code lease for an executive supposed to be on a temporary assignment. Six months later, he teleworks from the property, receives all his mail there, has terminated his previous lease, and enrolls his children in school there. You give notice according to your contract — he disputes it. Probable reclassification, inevitable litigation.

Case 2 — The genuine pied-à-terre

The tenant keeps his primary residence in Lyon, only occupies the Parisian apartment two to three days a week for his professional appointments, and can prove his primary residence with supporting documents. The Civil Code lease is perfectly consistent with reality. Risk of reclassification: low to none.

The difference between these two cases does not depend on the drafting of the contract. It depends on the tenant's actual profile.

How to secure a Civil Code lease

A well-used Civil Code lease is protected beforehand — not after the fact. The measures to take as soon as the lease is signed:

Action

Objective

Written certificate of secondary residence

Formalize the intention of the parties

Proof of primary residence elsewhere

Verify the consistency of the situation

Explicit mention of non-primary character

Secure the contract

Clause recalling the strictly secondary use

Prevent deviations during the lease

⚠️ No clause protects against actual occupation that is incompatible with the chosen status. If the tenant settles in permanently, the "secondary residence" clause will be set aside by the judge. Protection is in the profile — not in the drafting.

The tenant's profile: the real key to security

This is the point that many landlords underestimate. A secured Civil Code lease begins long before the contract is signed — it begins at the tenant selection stage.

The profiles that are truly compatible with a Civil Code lease are those for whom non-primary occupation is documentable, stable, and credible:

Companies and legal entities: a company that rents an apartment to house its mobile employees does not have a primary residence there. The contract is signed by the legal entity — the risk of reclassification is structurally almost non-existent.

Expatriates and diplomats: an expatriate executive whose employer pays for the Parisian accommodation keeps his tax and primary residence abroad. His situation is documented, verifiable, and perfectly compatible with a Civil Code lease.

Corporate relocation profiles: employees on international mobility arriving in Paris for a mission of a few months to two years are structurally suitable tenants for the Civil Code lease — provided that their previous primary residence is maintained or that the employer's sponsorship is formalized.

Holders of an established pied-à-terre: a person whose primary residence is documented in another city or abroad, and who uses the Parisian property partially and occasionally.

What these profiles have in common: they are impossible to find in bulk on mainstream platforms. They are obtained through specialized networks — which landlords trying to use the Civil Code lease on their own struggle to build.

Why going through a professional changes everything

The promise of the Civil Code lease — free rent, contractual flexibility, premium clientele — is only kept if the tenant is the right one. And finding the right profile in this segment requires a network that most landlords simply do not have.

BAUVAUT works directly with a network of partners specialized in international mobility and corporate relocation: relocation agencies (Relocation in Paris, Grospiron Mobility Solutions, Safexpat, Your Story in Paris, MyParisTouch…), corporate housing platforms (expatriation.io, Mecaza), high-end concierge services, and diplomatic networks. This network generates a constant flow of qualified inquiries — senior executives, expatriates, employees of international companies, diplomatic families — who are specifically looking for the type of property suitable for a Civil Code lease.

For an owner managing alone, building this network takes years. For an owner going through BAUVAUT, it is activated as soon as the property is listed.

Beyond making the connection, a professional brings three additional guarantees that an isolated owner cannot easily afford: a rigorous verification of the creditworthiness and consistency of the tenant's file, a customized contractual drafting on a case-by-case basis (duration, specific clauses, company sponsorship), and monitoring of the situation throughout the lease to detect as early as possible any shift in use incompatible with the regime.

What you need to remember

The Civil Code lease is an excellent tool — in the right cases. It becomes a major legal risk as soon as it is used to bypass the 1989 law or with a tenant whose actual situation does not correspond to its conditions. Protection is not in the clauses. It is in the tenant's profile — and in the ability to find the right profiles.


Suitable Civil Code lease

Risky Civil Code lease

Rental to a company or embassy

Tenant without other stable housing

Expatriate with primary residence abroad

Continuous occupation throughout the year

Executive on a documented short mission

Tax address in the property

Pied-à-terre with proven primary residence

Tenant found on a mainstream platform

Is your property eligible for a Civil Code lease?

BAUVAUT accompanies you from A to Z: qualification of your property, access to our network of relocation and corporate partners, selection of tenant profiles, drafting of the lease, and daily management. Contact us for an initial free discussion and an estimation of your optimal rent.